Hasil Koreksi Lomba Penulisan Cerita Rakyat (Mpama Kade’e)

Berdasarkan hasil koreksi Tim Juri Lomba Penulisan Cerita Rakyat (Mpama Kade’e), para finalis yang berhasil meraih gelar juara adalah sebagai berikut :  

 NO

 

JUDUL TULISAN PENULISAN SEKOLAH
1. LA MAI KAI KALO BOTE MUHAMMAD AKBAR SMA KAE WOHAKELAS XI IPA1
2. NDADI KAINA NGARA – NGARA RASA MA WARA ADE KEC. LAMBU FITRIANINGSIH ISHAKA SMA NEGERI 2LAMBU
3. OMPU DONGGO LABO WA’I LEMBO ADE NGUPA NGAHA DEI MOTI DIAN PUSPITASARI SMA KAE WOHAKELAS X5
4. AMA LABO INA SIMBU MAHFUDIN SMAN 1MADAPANGGA
5. IDA KA’ADU RADEN PUTRA BP. SMAN 1MADAPANGGAKELAS XII IA1
6. INA NENGGU NURJUMIATI SMA MUHAMMADIYAH SAPE

Selanjutnya para Finalis tersebut diharapkan kehadirannya untuk akan ditampilkan pada acara Festival Kalaki (Teluk Bima) pada : Hari / Tanggal                       : Minggu, 24 Juli 2011 Jam                                      : 08.30 Wita Tempat                                : Pantai Kalaki, Desa Panda, Kecamatan Palibelo

writing and Posting by Admin: Khusnul Hatimah (staf Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Kab. Bima)
Sumber : Disbudpar Kabupaten Bima

2 responses to “Hasil Koreksi Lomba Penulisan Cerita Rakyat (Mpama Kade’e)

  1. That Obama and his crew appear to be smitten with dictators like Chavez, Putin, Khamenei, Morsi, and until finally recently Assad, ought to alert voters that a little something is extremely wrong using the Democratic Get together. But it really isn’t going to seem to make any difference to most voters judging from recent polls. n nThis is alarming, due to the fact it points to your rift among Right and Still left which is too wide to bridge “politically.” The very last time this occurred was in 1860. n nIt may possibly be that 50 a long time of indoctrination by way of the schools and universities has so distorted and warped the thinking of 50 percent of our population, which the other halfconservatives and centristswill need to argue to retain the United States to be a constitutional republic guided by principles laid down in our founding documents. n nOne matter is distinct already: the Republican Bash is gutted and at least to the national level is of no use any extended. We go through with this magazine and in the WSJ and other conservative publications, that Mitt Romney ought to “do this and that,” much as being the exact same conservative media did in 2008. Back then it had been John McCain who sewed panic in his wake. Many of us recall the shock of realizing how poor McCain was. n nBut what we’ve nevertheless not admitted is this: that there may be a connection amongst campaigning and becoming president. 1 recalls what Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., wrote about Adlai Stevenson re: his currently being a loser within the get-go. Like McCain, like Romney, Stevenson could not communicate to ordinary Americans. He simply just lacked “the common touch,” which even our “aristocratic” presidentsWashington, FDR, JFK come to mindhad in abundance! n nHad he been elected, McCain would’ve been a disgraceful president, equally as George W. Bush, another GOP “gift from your dark side,” experienced been for eight long, painful many years. Now this man, Mitt the businessman! We read through desperate calls for Mitt to wake up, to speak from your soul, to tell us his “vision,” or how he sees The usa moving forward. Now, just after the violence inside the Middle East, commentators request Romney to set our minds at ease to convince us that he can lead get us by unscathed, which if he cannot that he’ll make a heroic and strong wartime president. A thing! Something! Be sure to! n nBut Mitt isn’t intending to do any such point. Why not? Simply because he’s Mitt. Practically nothing. Once again, the GOP offers us absolutely nothing. n nBut this time it just isn’t a concern of “winning the election.” This time, 2012, we’re facing the potential for true trouble. We’re broke, heavily in debt, as well as the earth is coming apart on the seamsthanks to 12 ages of uninterrupted governance below the level of mediocrity. Bush was a fool, which is providing that admittedly decent and very good guy considerably greater than he warrants. Why the harsh tone? For the reason that no man has the proper to overreach the Bush did. He experienced no small business seeking the office from the initial location. The Greeks called it “hubris,” what Bush did, in his case a form of self-appraisal that was horribly wide in the mark, unrealistic, narcissistic towards the core. Remember those flip interviews on his campaign bus with attractive female reporters? We ought to have know then what type of president he’d be. So my harshness isn’t the obsessive ranting the Left screamed at Bush during his two terms. This is a justified recrimination for what he did to this attractive nation, because he was and remains a guy who looks to not know who he is. This is not forgivable within a president, granted the stakes! n nAnd Mitt Romney, were he to win the electionwhat type of president would he be? The solution is: we already really know what variety of president he can be. He’s advertising the solution: the way in which he is functioning his campaign, the kinds of advisers he has chosen, the folks approximately him, and also the terms that appear away from his mouththese are the clearest indications possible of what sort of president Romney could be. n[continued in following comment] n

Leave a comment